<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>04749nas#a2200145ucc4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">0077984</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20260801081138.0</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="022" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">0020-9643</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="110" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Union Presbyterian Seminary</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Interpretation</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Monsters and the Bible</subfield>
    <subfield code="n">Nr. 2 April 74(2020)</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">74,H.2</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1">
    <subfield code="a">Los Angeles, Calif. [u.a.]</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Sage</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">2020</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Contributors  118 Editorial  Samuel L. Adams  120 On the Impossibility and Inevitability of Monsters in Biblical Thought  Kim Paffenroth  After general considerations of what constitutes a &#x201C;monster,&#x201D; this essay examines the examples of &#x201C;monsters&#x201D; in the  Bible, showing that the Bible does not as frequently depict such beings as do other mythologies. The implications of this  for understanding the biblical outlook on creation in general are considered, leading to the conclusion that in fact, in the  Bible, it is God who is a monster, or at least, on the side of monsters, and is not to be relied on to eradicate them.  132 The Good, the God, and the Ugly: The Role of the Beloved Monster in the Ancient Near East and the Hebrew Bible  Ryan S. Higgins  Ancient Near Eastern texts teem with horrifying and grotesque beings that pose some significant threat to the  cosmos, humanity, and its institutions. Adopting Noe&#xA8;l Carroll&#x2019;s definition, such beings are monsters: interstitial not only  physiologically and ontologically, but also cosmically and morally. This essay takes a comparative and literary approach to  beloved monsters in Ugaritic, Mesopotamian, and Hebrew Bible texts. It suggests that in Ugarit and Mesopotamia, such  monsters play a crucial role in advancing the goals of antipathic heroes while maintaining the integrity of sympathetic  deities. It then considers the beloved monster in the Hebrew Bible and its interpretations. Finally, the essay makes note  of the phenomenon&#x2019;s transformation in contemporary speculative fiction. The essay argues that the beloved monster in  Ugarit and Mesopotamia keeps together a fragmented cosmos, while in the Hebrew Bible it refracts through the cracks  in a fragmented God.  146 Leviathan to Lucifer: What Biblical Monsters (Still) Reveal  Kelly J. Murphy  Monsters and the monstrous show up in Scripture and outside the pages of Scripture. Two of the most famous biblical  monsters&#x2014;Leviathan and Satan&#x2014;appear and reappear in different forms, and, at times, their stories are merged into one.  A focus on Leviathan and Satan in Scripture helps readers to see the different ways the biblical texts depict monsters and,  especially, the relationship between humans, monsters, and the divine. As these creatures (re)appear in popular culture, often  drawing on their scriptural representations, they continue to provide a space for audiences to ask: what makes a monster and  what do these monsters reveal?  159 Constructing Imperial and National Identities: Monstrous and Human Bodies in Book of Watchers, Daniel, and 2 Maccabees  Anathea Portier-Young  Monster theory illuminates the construction of imperial and national identities in the portrayals of monstrous and  human bodies in three early Jewish texts: Book of Watchers, Daniel, and 2 Maccabees. Book of Watchers expresses  anxiety about Judean/Jewish identity in the shadow of empire through its portrayal of a vulnerable humanity terrorized  by voracious giants and their demonic spirits. Daniel dehumanizes empire and its agents, imaging empire as a colossal  statue, an animalistic were-king, and a series of monstrous beasts, while one like a human being poses an alternative to  imperial rule. Second Maccabees, by contrast, demythologizes, decapitates, dismembers, and disintegrates the imperial  body in order to portray the integral Judean political body (and soul) as mature, pure, capable, and ordered.  171 Holy Terror: Confronting Our Fears and Loving Our Movie Monsters  Craig Detweiler  While the natural world may scare us, more frightening beasts arise when we neglect our calling to care for creation  and &#x201C;play god&#x201D; via technology. From King Kong, Frankenstein, and Godzilla to recent films like The Babadook, The Shape of  Water and Us, the most enduring monsters provoke humility, evoke empathy, and prompt us to love rather than fear.  These holy terrors can offer an encounter with what Rudolf Otto famously called the mysterium tremendum.  183 Mapping the End: On Monsters and Maps in the Book of Revelation  Tina Pippin  The Book of Revelation is a map of the end time. Its apocalyptic story is full of monsters, from the throne room to the  abyss. Using new studies in literary cartography and spatiality studies, I argue that the text of Revelation can be read  as a map, and is itself a monster</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8">
    <subfield code="w">0030026</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">Interpretation</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">62678</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">62678</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">AWMBIB</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">AWMBIB</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">ZSAB</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2020-07-08</subfield>
    <subfield code="g">0.00</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">Interpretation</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">01189513</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2026-07-31 22:45:14</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2026-07-31</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">ZSR</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
